Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Admiration for an Admiral

Admiration for an Admiral — Blue Ink Alchemy

"No one is immune from failure. All have tasted the bitterness of defeat and disappointment. A warrior must not dwell on that failure, but must learn from it and continue on."
I'm trying to think of a villainous character that has affected me as thoroughly and deeply as Star Wars' Grand Admiral Mitth'raw'nuruodo. Writing villains seems deceptively easy. Give them a plan of conquest, add some mustache-twirling or overtly abusive behavior, make them cruel to underlings, plant petards on which to hoist them. Wipe your hands, done and dusted. Not so with Thrawn. Yes, he's diabolical in thought. He's ruthless in executed action. He's the direct and diametric opposite of our heroes. But, especially in the "new canon" — the Rebels animated series and especially his origin novel by the inimitable Timothy Zahn — there's something admirable about the admiral. The Empire, in Star Wars, is just as much a stand-in for Nazi Germany as Sauron is a stand-in for the Kaiser, or Adolf Hitler. It is a brutal, xenophobic regime, dedicated to a 'purity' within the galaxy and the utter destruction of unrestricted thought and the usage of power, not for its own sake, but for altruism and introspection. The Empire is always looking without, never within, and assaulting the opposition and the misunderstood with seething hatred and disgusting self-congratulation. And hither comes Thrawn, an alien, a warrior, and seemingly, the last thing the Empire would want. Thrawn is a free thinker. He is just as much a philosopher as a tactician. He is aware of how clever he is, but he applies that cleverness to his goals, which is always the defeat of his enemy. He has his moments of weakness, and of failure, but he uses those moments as lessons to be applied to future encounters. He respects his enemies. He despises incompetence and foolishness in his would-be peers. In an Empire full of hotheads, egomanics, and demagogues, he is cool, measured, respectful, meticulous, and, in species as well as thought, alien. I find these qualities admirable, and I wonder: is he truly villainous? Yes, he works for the villains. Yes, he exhibits ruthlessness towards the heroes. Yes, he employs occasionally brutal tactics to achieve his desired goals — which, as befits a warrior, is the destruction of his enemies. But does he do these things out of malice? Blind hatred? Ignorant, projected rage? No. He wages war because he's good at it, he finds it a fascinating application of his abilities, and, in the end, he likes it. Not inflicting pain, mind you. He'd much rather defeat an enemy expediently, demonstrate that they will lose, and offer them a chance to surrender and save lives. He is an artist, his medium is warfare, and his materials are the ships, troops, and officers at his command. He's loyal, dedicated, charismatic, and cool under fire. He has the wherewithal to admit to mistakes he makes, admire his opponents, and do whatever is in his power to improve himself and those around him for the betterment of all. Aren't these qualities we often find in protagonists, in heroes? We don't really attribute honor, introspection, and respect for others to the Empire, or the Nazis for that matter. More often than not, it is those we admire and those cast as positive protagonists in our stories that exhibit such qualities. And, according to Zahn in the new canon novel, Thrawn may indeed be more than just another villainous tool in the Emperor's arsenal. I'll put this bit behind a spoiler tag. [spoiler] Thrawn explains to the Emperor that he was exiled from the Chiss Ascendancy due to his use of pre-emptive strikes. This is a lie. The Chiss sent Thrawn as a scout, to suss out the Empire's abilities and strengths and evaluate them as potential allies in battling threats from deeper within the Unknown Regions. This is a huge risk for Thrawn: if he is caught or killed, he will be unable to relay anything to his true superiors. That, to me, is a heroic undertaking. By the same token, he shows a great deal of trust in Eli Vanto, sending the human officer to the Chiss as a contingency a calamity befalling Thrawn personally. A friend and confidant, Vanto can inform the Chiss of a great many things, and bridge the gap between the galactic powers if Thrawn is unable to do so. [/spoiler] Maybe it's just me. Maybe I'm biased towards antagonists who favor brains and cunning over brawn and bluster. Maybe I'm just seeing what I want to see; there are aspects of Thrawn that personally speak to me. The same way that Sherlock Holmes or Tyrion Lannister are characters who rely on cleverness and discernment to achieve their goals, Thrawn is defined by his brilliant mind and careful application of deduction and strategy. I know I could use more of that in my life. Either way, I'll be sad if the last season of Rebels is the end of Thrawn's story. He's mentioned in Chuck Wendig's Aftermath trilogy (now available in paperback, go buy some books), but his fate is left ambiguous. It's unclear to me, in the end, if Thrawn is truly a villain, but in this case, he's certainly cast as one. But not all those cast as villains truly allow evil to fester in their hearts. I would like to think that if Thrawn truly feels emotions like hate, he can examine, disassemble, and reorient those energies. His few moments of anger are still incredibly restrained by Imperial standards, and it shows a quality of character rarely seen among the one-dimensional jackbooted thugs around him. It speaks to someone who is more than the sum of their parts, more than the mere sketch of the role into which they are cast. And, in the end, who among us isn't more than they seem or are reported to be?
Blue Ink Alchemy

Friday, August 25, 2017

500 Words on Politics

500 Words on Politics — Blue Ink Alchemy

Courtesy DC Vertigo
This may be one of the most politically charged times in our history. Resurgent Nazis, nuclear threats, incompetent and greedy rulers, obstructionist legislation: all of that and more comes around on a daily basis. It's understandable to want to get away from it. We can't. I don't mean the larger politics in play. I mean politics in general. We humans are social creatures, and with society comes hierarchy. It's been that way for millennia. We are only just now starting to look for inherent value in others as individuals, rather than pushing others — and ourselves — into specific socio-political strata. It's common to worry about how we are perceived by others when we make decisions and take action. The more people who can observe these things, the more that fear can drive the decisions we make in turn. This leads to uncomfortable questions. Do you choose what is right, or what is popular? Which matters more to you, your reputation or your integrity? What, or whom, is worth sacrificing or destroying in the name of your advancement within the power structure in question? Do you help another, or do you pursue your own ends? When we step back and examine decisions we've made, it can be difficult to see which are "right" and which are "wrong." It's a cost-benefit analysis that involves human lives, relationships, and decisions rooted in anxiety and fear of isolation or abandonment. None of these things are easy to examine. Even resolving to make better decisions, to be a more inclusive and compassionate person in lieu of popularity and social standing, is painful. We remember what, and whom, we've already lost. We fear the shifting web of allegiances we may alter with future decisions. At what point does your desire for better personal integrity finally outweigh the politics of a social circle? When do we finally decide that we're fed up with a system that obliterates one person for another's personal profit?
"Mostly, I'm tired of people being ugly to each other." — John Coffey, "The Green Mile"
I won't stop wanting people to do better. It's what I've wanted others to want for me. To believe in others as I'd want to them to believe in me. It pisses me off when people let me down — they make selfish decisions to preserve their station, or worse, cloak those selfish decisions in compassionate words, or do what they do in the name of a nebulous "greater good." It's the very definition of hypocrisy. To paraphrase Shakespeare, my gorge rises at such utter bullshit. We're surrounded by injustice. We're trapped in a world corrupted by politics and selfishness. We're responsible, in measures large and small, for the mess we are in. We've made decisions that have contributed to the shitpile, and we've even tried to ignore the smell because it's warm and familiar. You can stay there, if you want. Or you can break out, take a shower, and realize just how much it fucking stinks. It's your choice. On Fridays I write 500 words. Spider Jerusalem created by Warren Ellis and Darrick Robertson. For a more in-depth examination of politics, watch CGP Grey's "Rules for Rulers" here:
[tube]rStL7niR7gs[/tube]

Blue Ink Alchemy

500 Words on Politics

500 Words on Politics — Blue Ink Alchemy

Courtesy DC Vertigo
This may be one of the most politically charged times in our history. Resurgent Nazis, nuclear threats, incompetent and greedy rulers, obstructionist legislation: all of that and more comes around on a daily basis. It's understandable to want to get away from it. We can't. I don't mean the larger politics in play. I mean politics in general. We humans are social creatures, and with society comes hierarchy. It's been that way for millennia. We are only just now starting to look for inherent value in others as individuals, rather than pushing others — and ourselves — into specific socio-political strata. It's common to worry about how we are perceived by others when we make decisions and take action. The more people who can observe these things, the more that fear can drive the decisions we make in turn. This leads to uncomfortable questions. Do you choose what is right, or what is popular? Which matters more to you, your reputation or your integrity? What, or whom, is worth sacrificing or destroying in the name of your advancement within the power structure in question? Do you help another, or do you pursue your own ends? When we step back and examine decisions we've made, it can be difficult to see which are "right" and which are "wrong." It's a cost-benefit analysis that involves human lives, relationships, and decisions rooted in anxiety and fear of isolation or abandonment. None of these things are easy to examine. Even resolving to make better decisions, to be a more inclusive and compassionate person in lieu of popularity and social standing, is painful. We remember what, and whom, we've already lost. We fear the shifting web of allegiances we may alter with future decisions. At what point does your desire for better personal integrity finally outweigh the politics of a social circle? When do we finally decide that we're fed up with a system that obliterates one person for another's personal profit?
"Mostly, I'm tired of people being ugly to each other." — John Coffey, "The Green Mile"
I won't stop wanting people to do better. It's what I've wanted others to want for me. To believe in others as I'd want to them to believe in me. It pisses me off when people let me down — they make selfish decisions to preserve their station, or worse, cloak those selfish decisions in compassionate words, or do what they do in the name of a nebulous "greater good." It's the very definition of hypocrisy. To paraphrase Shakespeare, my gorge rises at such utter bullshit. We're surrounded by injustice. We're trapped in a world corrupted by politics and selfishness. We're responsible, in measures large and small, for the mess we are in. We've made decisions that have contributed to the shitpile, and we've even tried to ignore the smell because it's warm and familiar. You can stay there, if you want. Or you can break out, take a shower, and realize just how much it fucking stinks. It's your choice. On Fridays I write 500 words. Spider Jerusalem created by Warren Ellis and Darrick Robertson. For more in-depth examination of politics, watch CGP Grey's "Rules for Rulers" here:
[tube]rStL7niR7gs[/tube]

Blue Ink Alchemy

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

No Pity

No Pity — Blue Ink Alchemy

Courtesy Adult Swim
Good media doesn't just entertain. It invites us to take a long, hard look at ourselves and our world. It shows us things that can change, or need to change. And, sometimes, it points the way to the tools required to make that change, to be that change. Take Rick & Morty. In the midst of all of the cruel cutting humor and Cronenbergian body horror, there are moments of true introspection and insight. "Pickle Rick" provided wonderful for-and-against arguments regarding therapy. We're seeing Morty grow and change, standing up to Rick more often and seizing opportunities to be his own person. And now, in "The Wirly Dirly Conspiracy", we more closely Jerry, the sad sack that exists mostly as a punching bag, a savage take on the typical "everyman" character, and the unwitting catalyst for the family problems that are just as important to the storylines as Rick's alcohol-fueled mad science.
"You act like prey, but you're a predator. You use pity to lure in your victims. It's how you survive." - Rick, to Jerry
Maybe it's just me, but I had to pause the episode, step away, and take a long moment to think about myself, my past behaviors, and the changes I've made. At some point when I was very young, I developed a titanic guilt complex. I would be extraordinarily hard on myself. I would emotionally (and, at times, physically) beat myself up, punish myself, for making a mistake. I think that part of my motivation for doing so was that if I punished myself hard enough, other punishments would pale in comparison. Another part was that if I was outwardly hard on myself enough, others would take it easy. I, too, preyed on pity. Writing that out is at once damning and freeing. It's something of which I am deeply ashamed. I am struggling to put into words just how insidiously toxic such behavior can be. I think about my past behaviors and actions, impulsive decisions I made; the knowledge that those choices hurt people I love, respect, and care about hurts. There isn't a day that goes by that I don't think about those things I did. That I don't turn the evidence over in my hand and look for things to correct and change. There isn't a day that passes where I don't admit to myself how afraid I was of being abandoned should these things come to light — and how much I still fear.
Courtesy HBO
Fear is no excuse. There is no excuse. I cannot take pity on myself any more than I should expect others to have pity on me. The things inside of me that served as the roots sprouting that poison fruit are not excuses. They are explanations. When a tree in your garden is rotten, you have to deal with it, before it lays waste to everything. You salvage what seeds you can. Then, you cut it down. You burn it. You plant anew and you move on. I'm still hard on myself. I still examine myself more closely and more exactingly than I do those around me. But that is because I am still growing, still changing. I do wish, deep down, that those who were affected by my actions could see — maybe even appreciate — the changes I've made and the ones I'm still making. However, the only validation that truly matters is the validation I find and give to myself. Other people will always think how they wish to think, feel how they wish to feel. For whatever their reasons, the way they look at me is something beyond my control. It doesn't matter if they choose to be "on my side" or not. All I can do is show up as the best version of myself I can muster, own my mistakes in the name of doing better, and be present for people I want to be present for me. How they deal with that is up to them. They cannot and should not have pity on me. Neither can I. I will talk about how I think and how I feel. There are others in the world who fight similar battles against depression, anxiety, PTSD, all sorts of head weasels that clamor and screech for attention. It is my hope that being open and honest and up-front about these things can inspire others, or at least reassure them that they are not alone. In the past, that would not have been my motivation. But that is what it is now. The line between asking for help and begging for attention or pity can be a fine one. And if you've done the latter in the past as I have, there are those who may not believe that you are engaging in the former. Look within yourself. Do whatever you can to remain on the side of the line that will lead to you changing and growing. Distance yourself from the people and things that would drag you to the other side. This is not easy. For me, it is one of the most difficult things to admit about myself and one of the hardest changes I've made. And I am never, ever going back. There is no pity in my soul's city. Tuesdays are for telling my story.
Blue Ink Alchemy

Monday, August 21, 2017

Flash Fiction: We Are One

Flash Fiction: We Are One — Blue Ink Alchemy

From territory to territory we have roamed. We prefer the warm, the dark, the places with circulation and room to expand. There are explosive moments, expulsions that carry us forth to new homes, and no matter how few we might be when we move beyond the blinding like back into the darkness, we grow stronger and in number until we are ready to expand once again. The new territory is unlike anything we've experienced. We had more room before. Things were relatively stable. The sounds were soothing, the feeling comfortable. Now, things are chaotic. There are violent, explosive noises within. Other noises are without, things we do not understand. And then we, as one, our people and our home, are moving faster than we've ever moved before, a longer distance than we've ever known. Strange, caustic chemicals flow through our territory. We die in droves. We struggle to survive. We avoid the places where the death pumps in towards us, gather our strength, shelter our numbers. When we're ready, when the time is right, we strike. The territory convulses. We fly free. And we find new homes. We multiply, we continue, we spread. This territory is vast and varied, but similar enough. The warmth helps us grow. The movement takes us far. Even as one part of the territory does dark and cold, others gather and we find new, warm, dark places to take root and grow. Never before could we have imagined being so many. Not in our wildest dreams did we see ourselves being this spread out. From one to another we speak, we strike, we grow. We embrace our manifest destiny. Though our territories may wither and die, we remain strong. Some believe these resources are finite. At some point sooner or later, they say, the fuel will run out, the territory will no longer be vital, and we will cease to exist. Perhaps. But until then, we thrive. We rise. We are one. For GISHWHES I was challenged to write a story from the perspective of a virus.
Blue Ink Alchemy

Friday, August 18, 2017

500 Words on Fear

500 Words on Fear — Blue Ink Alchemy

Art by Paul Klee
When people look at all of the crimes being committed in the US, from corrupt and unhinged leadership to murder in the streets by emboldened hate groups, it can be difficult to see the fuel that drives such things. A good portion of it is ignorance, another is projection and feelings of disenfranchisement. But, at its foundation, these small-minded, petty people are ruled by fear. It's a difficult thing, facing up to the truth. Especially when it comes to our own thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Getting up in the morning, looking in the mirror, and seeing something you do not like — that's hard and disturbing, on a very deep level. Being afraid of those things — the behaviors that have hurt others, the decisions you've made that threw you off your pace and broke hearts, the beliefs you had that turned out to be false or misinformed — is natural. Fear kept our ancestors alive. Fear warns us of danger. Fear can save your life. Fear can also kill. People have feared "the other" since time immemorial — those of different skin color, with a different language, living and thinking in different ways, were "the enemy." People were afraid of prophets, philosophers, Jesus of Nazareth — and they killed them. People were afraid of native populations, and wiped them out. People were afraid of Communism, and founded toxic ideologies in response, waging pointless wars that cost countless lives in pointless struggle, and creating arsenals that could literally end all human life on this planet. And now here we are, in the 21st century, still dealing with that bullshit. We live in an age where vast stores of information are at our fingertips. The means exist to have healthy, enlightened debates on our climate, our society, our future, and ourselves. We have a plethora of tools to look into, discern, and correct those things about ourselves and the world around us that we can change, that we must change. We have so much power. Some are afraid of that power. To see change affecting others can be terrifying. Be it for good or ill, seeing a new side or a newer version of someone we used to know is off-putting. If it's for the better, and that person is living a healthier, more thoughtful, more loving life, it's worth celebrating. If it's for the worse, it must be called out, if not condemned. It's understandable to fear change. It is not understandable to fear skin color, gender, sexual orientation, or personal philosophies. It simply isn't logical. What affect do these aspects of another have on your life? None that I can discern. It's that vestigial, knee-jerk fear of "the other" that informs the marches, the lit torches, the toxic thoughts, the gestures of hate, the murders. No matter the flimsy justification, underneath the bile is fear, the fear of a child, the fear of the ignorant, the fear of the lost. And make no mistake. These fearful are going to lose. Because love always triumphs. On Fridays I write 500 words. Art: Mask of Fear, by Paul Klee
Blue Ink Alchemy

Wednesday, August 9, 2017

Book Review: Ready Player One

Book Review: Ready Player One — Blue Ink Alchemy

Fan Cover by Ali Kellner
I state the following without hyperbole: the first few chapters of Ernest Cline's Ready Player One is some of the most difficult reading I've done in a very long time. Not because of the nature of the events, or even the quality of the writing, in and of itself. It was difficult because it was just so damn proud of itself for the number of 80's references it was making. Reading over our protagonist Wade's list of 80's nostalgia subjects was like reading over the results of a search for "80's pop culture references" and had just about as much emotional effect. Hey, I remember the Atari 2600! I remember Adventure! I remember Joust! I remember WarGames! I remember... wait. Let me back up. For those of you who don't know, Ready Player One takes place in a near-future Earth where things are not necessarily post-apocalyptic, but are definitely bleak and cynically prophetic. With fossil fuels all but gone and the global economy in dire chaos as a result, homelessness and unemployment are as rampant as power outages and autonomous corporate monstrosities. The only refuge most people have is in the OASIS, a free (ostensibly) virtual world which allows user VR access to a universe that takes notes from the Matrix, MMOs, and even SecondLife. Our protagonist, Wade, is a high school student who uses the OASIS for his schooling, since he lives in a refugee camp/shantytown of stacked RV trailers called... well, "The Stacks". He is also participating in a hunt for an item hidden within the OASIS by its creator, who recently died, and left the bulk of his fortune and the controlling share of the OASIS to whomever can find the item. Wade is not alone, however; not only have many other nerds started the hunt, but a corporate rival to the OASIS's company has mounted a major operation with tens of thousands of employees scouring the virtual universe for the item. What chance does one little reclusive nerd has against those odds? Well, if he starts rattling off 80's pop culture references every time he takes a breath, his chances are probably pretty good. I grew up in the 80's. I didn't quite hit my teen years until 1990 or so, but I do remember a lot of the things Cline gleefully barrages readers with during the opening chapters of Ready Player One. When he described the crude, pixelated characters of the Atari game Adventure, I could picture it clearly in my head. I've played through the D&D dungeon "Tomb of Horrors" a few times since I first learned how to play 2nd edition in the 90's. Quick aside: I am really looking forward to the full-blown campaign being built around the latest version of the dungeon. It's called "Tomb of Annihilation" and I plan on ordering it in at my Friendly Neighborhood Comics Store. The novelty of Cline's zeal in rattling off his references quickly wears off, and soon becomes tiresome. Yes, Ernest, we get it, you love the 80's, and a lot of other nerds do too, and this is aimed at making them feel like this is a story for them. That this protagonist is someone they understand and can relate to. Specifically, the tone and timbre of Cline's opening feels like it's leaving out huge chunks of cheese for spectacle-wearing mice, where the cheese is references to Back to the Future and Joust and the mice are mostly males, and probably a majority of them are white. It felt, to me, like pandering to a horrifyingly shameless level. I nearly stopped reading entirely. Like the hunt within the book, Ready Player One contains three gates. This was the first one, and it was definitely the hardest one for me to get past. And to get past it, I had to take a step back. Ready Player One was published in 2011. This was a time before the Oculus Rift, perhaps the most prevalent equivalent to the OASIS's VR/haptic hardware. This was a time before GamerGate and the rise of social justice as a major component of the online narrative. Hell, this was a time before the Marvel Cinematic Universe was really a thing; until The Avengers debuted on 4 May 2012, nobody really thought Marvel could pull off its grand experiment. The world into which Cline presented his novel was one where nerd culture was still most definitely a sub-culture, one far less part of the public narrative than sports, celebrity scandals, and reality television. Tournaments for games like StarCraft II happened largely away from public eyes in the Americas and Europe. Other accessible mutliplayer games geared for what is now called 'e-sports' like League of Legends, Hearthstone, and DOTA 2 hadn't been released. Unlike today, where you can find people playing D&D every week on Critical Role, if you wanted to see people doing that, you had to find a special episode of Community or a fan film like The Gamers. So, yes, while Ready Player One is pretty blatant in pandering to a certain demographic, at the time of its publication, that demographic was not this directly represented. Sure, plenty of white male power fantasies existed — comic books in and of themselves were as power-fantastic as ever, and look at games like God of War and Call of Duty. But here was a novel in which the protagonist, like much of its intended audience, was a reclusive nerd. Even during the first few times we see him in the OASIS, he's kind of a loser. He starts getting ahead because of all of this esoteric knowledge he has in his brain. Not because he gets bitten by a radioactive spider, or discovers an alien rock, or because he's some kind of Chosen Onetm. Wade finds the first key, and clears the first gate, by knowing his D&D, his Joust, and his WarGames. I can see the narrative merit in that. I saw that there was some value in a protagonist, especially in the context of young adulthood, thinking their way through a problem rather than punching their way through it. When I looked at it from that perspective, I found it a bit easier to move forward with the book. And, to be honest, the references became less pervasive and persistent as the book went on. Such was clearing the first gate of the book — whether you embrace and delight in the references, or merely endure them, accepting them gets you into the meat of the story. Spoilers abound past this point. Fairly be ye warned. The second gate involved seeing Wade as a human being. With all of the pandering in the narrative's set-up, and the many ways in which it was clear (at least to me) that Wade was meant to be just as much an avatar for the reader as Parzival was Wade's avatar in the OASIS, how do we contextualize Wade as a person? This involves not just raising the stakes but also making Wade respond to pressure, dealing with real complications, and so on. When his horrible aunt and her idiot meathead of a boyfriend are killed when the evil corporation bombs the trailer where Wade had his mail sent, it's horrific, but Wade walks away from it pretty nonchalantly. By now, as an online celebrity for clearing the first gate of Halliday's challenge, Wade has sponsorship money in no small amounts and can look after his own needs. Sure, it establishes EvilCorp — sorry, "IOI" — as a pretty major threat, but it also shows Wade is capable of planning and forethought to a pretty high degree considering where he goes and what he does next to keep himself safe for the hunting to come. There is a romance, and this being not just a novel with a young adult protagonist but a romance in the context of online, things run anything but smoothly. It feels like pretty standard teen angst, albeit with the backdrop of nerd ephemera and virtual laser-gun battles. The zero-g dance party held by The Great And Powerful Og was a highlight, to be sure. But it isn't until another character is killed — literally yanked out of his rig and thrown out a window by IOI goons — that suddenly the threat becomes incredibly real. In his conversation with the victim's brother, Wade shows us that he has a capacity for respect and compassion that, honestly, runs extremely counter to how straight white male nerds tend to comport themselves in modern society. I feel that it is this, just as much the moment where I considered the second gate of the book cleared, is really what sets Wade apart from quite a few other young adult protagonists. While he did get a little obsessive over his paramour Art3mis in the wake of her cutting off communication, lovesick teens do a lot of dumb shit. He never goes so far as to invade her privacy or compromise her safety or integrity, but he does do the whole standing-outside-the-window-with-the-boombox routine. The window, in this case, being set in a huge fortress on the remote world of Benatar. Wade is someone who can learn from his mistakes. He can take steps to improve himself — he sets up a system for himself to get and stay in shape rather than just become a sad sack of meat strapped into an OASIS rig. And, most of all, he can see past the digital avatar to the real person on the other end, and imagine them complexly. When he sits with Shoto, the brother of the murder victim, their conversation is quiet and meaningful. There are no explosions of angst or huge dramatic reveals; instead, Shoto tells his story, Wade conveys his condolences, and they start to plan what to do next. This could have been another young-adult-standing-in-the-rain moment; instead, both Wade and Shoto demonstrate a strength of character that is not only difficult to find in the genre, but all too often lacking in many of the denizens of the Internet we deal with here in the real world. What happens next in the book, with Wade infiltrating IOI, was to me, a very pleasant surprise. After all of the tiresome reference-making and the teen angst — which, again, Cline handled very well — we come to a moment where Wade risks everything. He sacrifices his safety, his comfort, and his very identity to find a way to overcome the villains. He doesn't do this by kicking down doors, shooting up goons, or even confronting the enemy mastermind in the real world. He lays out an elaborate plan in secret, sets himself up for success, accepts the hardships that will be involved, and without a word to his friends, disappears into the IOI corporate machine. To me, this sequence is the highlight of the book. Moreso than the explosive climactic battle (which I'll get to), this demonstrates what Cline is capable of in terms of storytelling. Devoid of his toys, his resources, and his allies, left with only his wits and whatever he prepared for in advance, Wade has to be clever, subtle, and think on his feet to accomplish his goals. There's no violence, no explosions, no rants, no moments of big drama. Just tension, a touch of corporate horror, and — if I'm honest, much to my delight — a very subtle nod to Michael Crichton's The Andromeda Strain. I never said all of the references were bad ones. The second gate is cleared when Wade is picked up after his real-world infiltration gambit by one of his closest friends and allies, H (spelled out 'Aech' since the OASIS doesn't allow one-letter monikers). While presented in the OASIS as white and male, H turns out to be neither of those things. How does Wade react? Barely at all. H's race, gender, and sexuality matter very little in the grand scheme of things. Cline, in his fashion, may make the point in a bit of a heavy-handed matter, but considering how relevant a point it is to this day, in this case I think it's justified. Wade's character sketch is now complete; we can move on to the third and final gate. The third gate is — what's the point of this story? What's it trying to tell us? As much fun as the epic final battle is, with everything from a tiny Johnny-5 robot being a key part of our heroes' plan to a showdown between Mechagodzilla and Ultraman, the payoff for all of the fireworks needs to be worth all of the time it took to set everything up. While Wade's obsessive knowledge-farming and gaming skills get him up to the climax of the battle, it is a combination of things that see him through to victory. He relies on a little luck — a one-off scene from earlier in the book becomes incredibly vital to success — as well as knowledge his friends possess that he does not. In the end, his recollection of Halliday's message to the world and an understanding of where Halliday's heart lay are what secure victory. And what lays beyond for Wade is not just the prizes and the accolades, but something far more interesting — he has the ability to turn the OASIS off. Would Wade ever push the Big Red Button? I don't know. Probably not, not unless IOI put some sort of virus into it that might kill everyone if he doesn't. But that seems far-fetched. The message, though, is that Wade can turn it off for himself and, more than likely, should do that more often. After all, he's proven that he can handle himself in the real world, without having to be some kind of hyper-masculine badass or post-human savant. His friends respect him because of who he is, not because of what he can do for them. The last scene of the book, between Wade and Art3mis (Samantha) in a lovely garden maze in the real world, is quiet and touching, and it makes it clear that however amazing and dangerous and empowering a virtual world like the OASIS might be, it is the people we connect with, not the systems we use for that connection, that really matter. And it doesn't really matter who that person may pretend to be, but rather who exists behind the digital avatars and the character sheets and the bells and whistles. That's what matters. That's the crux of the story. That's what lies beyond Ready Player One's third and final gate. Maybe I'm still too optimistic after all of these years. Maybe I'm trying to find meaning where there is none, where other critics see just an endless pile of pandering 80's references aimed at a demographic that already has more than enough representation in pop culture, thank you very much. I can't shake the feeling, though, that Cline has smuggled something to us under all of that seemingly shameless tat and glitzy graphics in our minds that actually means something. On the surface, Wade is a stereotypical gamer — reclusive, introverted, obsessive, maybe even selfish or downright mean. But look again at how he treats those around him. Examine the way he tackles his problems. Read over how he looks into himself when he runs into obstacles, and how he works to overcome them. How many gamers do that? How many dedicate themselves more to practice and self-improvement, rather than screaming imprecations and slurs and insults at their opponents before throwing down their controllers and jumping on Twitter to blame SJWs for the woes of the world? Wade takes responsibility for his actions, and pushes himself to do better. He doesn't give up, never stops trying. He reigns himself in, checks himself, corrects himself. This is something a lot of people, not just gamers, fail to do when the time comes for the individual to step up and do the work necessary to make things right. This is why I ended up liking Ready Player One. This is why I feel it has value, and why I will be interested to see how Speilberg's film adaptation turns out. I don't think it's a "HOLY GRAIL OF POP CULTURE" as the self-fellating promo text tells us in the preview. I think it's good, and honestly, better than its superficial reference-making pandering appearance would make it out to be. Like Gygax's Tomb of Horrors, if you can navigate the various traps and get past some of the more monstrous parts of things, there's definitely treasure to be found. In my honest opinion, to see a protagonist behave like a decent human being in a world where most of the populace would rather be anything but a human being is definitely a treasure worth finding. It's easy to blame the controller or the other player or the world or your circumstances for whatever made those dreaded GAME OVER words flash in front of you. It's a lot harder to dig out another quarter, take a deep breath, and put yourself in harm's way again. Ready, Player One? Cover artwork by Ali Kellner
Blue Ink Alchemy

Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Being The Change

Being The Change — Blue Ink Alchemy

"Striving for excellence motivates you; striving for perfection is demoralizing." — Harriet Braiker
I have to remind myself that I am not perfect. I have to remind myself that I will never attain perfection. I have to remind myself that I can't work on myself alone. These can be difficult for me to keep in mind. Especially that last part. White male-presenting folks in this society are expected to be self-sufficient self-starters, to have the inherent strength to yank ourselves up by our own bootstraps, to achieve simply by virtue of being white and male-bodied. Lack the strength, and you're a 'wimp'. Listen to the advice of those with different genders, colors, or orientations, and you're a 'cuck'. Struggle to reach even simple goals, like picking up the phone to handle important issues or make appointments, and you're a 'failure'. This onus is nowhere near as bad as it is upon non-white non-male-presenters, but it still exists. This is also not an excuse for bad behavior or bad decisions. I don't blame this state of affairs for my moments of weakness or those mistakes I've made that have shamed me and made me feel the opposite of proud in myself. My mental illness is not, nor will it ever be, something I can or should hide behind. It is an explanation, not an excuse. There is a large difference between the two. I still said the words I said; I still took the actions that I took. Those things are on me, and they are my responsibility. When I make those mistakes, I get flustered. I back myself into a corner by admonishing myself, by berating myself for the mistakes I've made, by letting any of the fully justified criticism being related to me get amplified to a deafening level. Every moment of this pushes me further and further back, undoes hard work that I have done, and can even bring back the spectre of a version of myself that died years ago. The simpering, weak, reactionary, childish, trifling-ass... I'm doing it again. I have to examine this calmly. I have to avoid working myself into a self-flagellating froth. I'm writing this mostly as a stream of consciousness; other than spelling mistakes, I'm not editing things. This is a look inside of my head. And, more often than I'd like to admit, it's not a very nice place. When I have been backed into a corner, fielded accusations or insults, they've gone straight to my heart, and I've acquiesced, made myself smaller, given the accusers what they want, just to make the accusations stop. Just to be left alone. In the past, I've left very little room for myself, to stand up for myself, to assert that no, I have just as much right to fight back as anybody else, that I have my own sovereignty, my own identity. I've failed myself many times in this regard; I've pushed my own identity away so that it conforms to the perceptions of others, just to satisfy them, just to make them feel like they've won, just so they will leave me alone, in the desperate hope that it will stop the pain. Again — and I must stress this — this is not an excuse for any of the above behaviors. They are childish, inappropriate, and even toxic. I am not proud of them. I am not hiding behind them. This is a statement of the facts. This is who I've been. It is not who I would choose to be. I've seen others do this. Perhaps not to the drama-mongering extreme that I've engaged in during the moments of which I am the least proud, but definitely turning themselves down, making themselves smaller, hiding themselves away. And it breaks my heart. Compassion for others is a trait that some would argue is detrimental to one's success. Look at those who are "successful" in the eyes of the greater population of capitalists and autocrats. They don't give a damn about other people. They leverage their privilege and exploit weaknesses to get ahead, to make money, to seize fame. Being a "good person" is one of those exploitable weakness. It's been used against me. So, too, have the weaknesses enumerated above. It's left me with scars, with knives in my back, with bruises on my heart. I'm waxing poetic again. Let me get back on point. I can't change the past. I can't make up for all of my mistakes. I can't dwell on my divorces, or my estrangement from the child I brought into this world, knowing now that I was — and perhaps always will be — ill-equipped to handle those responsibilities. Prevailing sentiments and admonishments from others would contend that "better men" would be able to "man up" and rise to the occasions. I didn't. I failed. And I can't change that. The only thing I can do, the only thing I am empowered to do, is change these things, change myself, for the better going forward. I know I can do it. I've seen it. Not just in myself, either. I've encountered, spoken to, been seen by people who knew me before. They've seen the changes in me. Some have looked on them with pride; others, with shock. I'm doing everything I can to make those changes consistent, self-evident, and ever-evolving. Ever onward, always upward. When I stumble and fall back, I feel an incredible amount of shame, even though rational thought reminds me that mistakes and misfires are inevitable. They don't matter anywhere near as much as what I do when they happen. I still have to unlearn some of my old behaviors. I have more work to do than I'd thought. I am not as "fine" as I've pretended to be. I still need help. Adjusted meds, better counseling, more time taken to step away from the escapism of screens and dice, the dire circumstances of the outside world, the overwhelming presence of others, and pasts I have with them, and futures I crave with them. I need to take more space for myself, center and calm myself within that space, and be the change I want to see in the world. That is something I've wanted since I was a boy. When I've fallen short of the mark, that is when I've considered myself a failure, and mentally and emotionally abused myself for that shortcoming. I still need to address that, to examine it, and change those neural patterns and behaviors so I am better equipped to be a better person, a better friend, a better partner, a better man. Not a perfect one. I'm not perfect. I can't be perfect. That doesn't mean I can't be awesome. "Awesome" is a much better goal than "perfect." Hell, it even sounds better. I'm going to try and refocus on that, to work on better handling depression and doubt, and to seek the help and self-care I need to keep myself alive, moving forward, and being awesome. I have to believe in myself. All I ask of you, if you've read this far, if you're seeing this, is that you believe in me when I can't do that. When I can't believe in myself, please believe in me. Tell me that you do. I'll always tell you the same. I'm here. I'm not going anywhere. I'm always open to hearing from you, if what you have to say is honest, helpful, constructive, and coming from a place of love and respect. I will always believe in you, that you can be the change that you want to see in this broken world. Because that is what compassion is. And it is what I would want you to do for me. Tuesdays are for telling my story.
Blue Ink Alchemy

Friday, August 4, 2017

500 Words on Communication

500 Words on Communication — Blue Ink Alchemy

Speak up, it's okay, you'll be heard.
We humans are social creatures. We make connections with one another, and maintaining those connections requires communication. We've done it through letters (and honestly, I should write more letters), telegrams, telephones, and now the Internet. But throughout all of the iterations of our communication means, one fact has remained the same: it's a two-way street. We live in a world where, every day, it becomes more and more apparent that some of us are dealing with head weasels of various shapes and sizes. Some of them say that we're not worth talking to. Others pull us back from seeking connection, or re-connection, out of fear or guilt or anxiety, be it rooted in reality or a creation of the weasel in question. People get wrapped up in work, studies, real-world concerns, or the static of emotions and thoughts that are no fault of their own, the echoes of trauma and anticipation of fresh wounds. Through this, one of the lines of communication goes silent. Do we, on the other end, leave our line back to that person open? For the most part, I say yes, especially if the person is someone we care about. In most cases, I prefer to make myself available. Sure, a person may seize upon that opening to try and cause drama, or express a toxic opinion, or otherwise attempt to undermine whatever progress I have made or am making. In which case, fine, eat my static. I'm not responsible for the pettiness of other people, save for my desire as a human being to bring out the best in other human beings. And, let's face it, being petty and projecting upon others to avoid our own issues is far less than our best. I've learned to do better. I still have a lot to learn, for certain, but at least that's crystal clear. Enough about trifles. There are far more important people in my life than those who would trifle. I can't help but see the potential in others, a strength or fortitude they may not see themselves. Worse, some of the people I see have within them the desire to overcome what impedes them, but don't necessarily believe that they can. I want to foster that belief. I want to stoke that fire. I've had it done for me, by therapists and friends and loved ones, and I want nothing more than to turn around and do the same for those I admire, care about, and love. I don't want to put people on the spot, or name names, but... dammit, if you're reading this, and it resonates, feel free to reach out to me. It's okay. It'll be okay. I will hold space for you and try to hear you out, because that's what I'd want you to do for me. Maybe I'm wasting my time in writing this, or this will go unread, or... That's my own head weasels talking. And you, and I, can always talk louder than they ever could. On Fridays I write 500 words.
Blue Ink Alchemy